Propagation Modeling on the Georgia Tech Campus

JLeeCorp for Springularizon, Inc.

| Description of Problem | Technical Discussion | Comparison with Known Coverage Maps | Practicality and Economics | References |

Comparison with Known Coverage Maps

Four coverage maps (A-D) were provided with actual received power data which we used both to develop and test our model. A script to compare the predicted received power map generated by our model and the original data was provided. Below, the standard deviation and mean of our model errors for each of the four coverage maps are provided in dB. Note that the colorbar to the right of the maps is in dB. In addition, associated information such as antenna details, coordinates, etc. are provided with each map.

Map A

mean error: -2.67 dB
std deviation: 12.14 dB

Figure 1. Actual received power data for Map A provided by Springularizon.

Figure 2. Predicted received power data Map A, as generated from our model.

Map B

mean error: +6.27 dB
std deviation: 11.02 dB

Figure 3. Actual received power data for Map B provided by Springularizon.

Figure 4. Predicted received power data Map B, as generated from our model.

Map C

mean error: -3.32 dB dB
std deviation: 12.87 dB

Figure 5. Actual received power data for Map C provided by Springularizon.

Figure 6. Predicted received power data Map C, as generated from our model.

Map D

mean error: +0.46 dB dB
std deviation: 10.62 dB

Figure 7. Actual received power data for Map D provided by Springularizon.

Figure 8. Predicted received power data Map D, as generated from our model.