|   Orbital Mechanics 
		      It is essential to have knowledge of orbital mechanics to  understand space operations as it holds a cornerstone value in orbital path  design. Orbital mechanics is the study of the motion of planetary objects, artificial  satellites, and space vehicles. This field deals with trajectories of space  bodies, their orbital changes, and interplanetary transfers. In this section,  we will study the orbital mechanics that have been designed for our rocket to  lift off from Earth and carry a payload to the Moon. In this section, we will shed light on various planetary laws and fundamental principles dealing with  space flight mechanics. Remembering the Pioneers  Before delving into the specifics of  our mission’s orbital mechanics design, two great individuals  who have played a pivotal role in shaping astronomy must be mentioned. The German  astronomer, Johannes Kepler (1571 – 1630), shown below, developed the three  laws of planetary motion using the previous analysis and observations of the Hungarian astronomer Tycho Brahe. These laws hold a fundamental value in  the study of orbital mechanics as they define the motion of a body in an  ellipse. We employ his laws when determining the flight path duration  from our parking orbit to the moon.  
 Sir Isaac Newton, shown below, requires no introduction.  
 “Of all the mathematics  developed up until the time of Isaac Newton, Newton’s was by far the better half.” -- Lifelong rival of Isaac Newton,  Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz4 The roots of  modern day orbital mechanics can be traced to Newton in the early 17th  century, when he formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation5.  Newton realized that the force by which an apple falls from a tree to the ground  is the same one that makes planets fall around the sun6. Newton also  concluded such a planetary orbit should be elliptical after  he was able to deduce Kepler’s laws while solving his own equations for laws of  motion and universal gravitation. Newton’s laws are employed in various parts  of our design solution. Return to top Launch Location 			    Selecting a rocket launch location determines the inclination  and altitude of the orbit. The most propellant-efficient orbit for a given altitude and payload mass is  one that has low inclination. As such, the launch site needs to be as close to  the equator as possible.   Inclination is the angular distance of the orbital plane of a  launched vehicle from the plane of reference, which is usually the primary  body’s equator (the Earth in this case), and is measured in degrees. Inclination  of 0 degrees means that the plane of the orbiting body is the same as the  equatorial plane of the planet and is in the direction of rotation of the  planet.  We have selected the Reagan Test Site on Omelek Island,  located 2,500 miles southwest from Hawaii (9°2.890'N, 167°44.585'E) due to  the Island’s  close proximity to the equator. Omelek Island is part of the Kwajalein Atoll in  the Marshall Islands2. Earth rotates about its axis towards the east. We  can determine the rotational velocity of the earth at the equator to be: 
 As such, any easterly launch near the equator will have a  velocity increment of approximately 0.4561 km/s imparted  due to Earth’s  rotation3. On the other hand, a launch which is not into an  equatorial orbit will reduce the payload capabilities of the rocket and this  reduction has a linear relationship to inclination5.  Return to top Launching  the Spacecraft into Orbit 
		      During launch, the  rocket engine is ignited, tremendous thrust is produced, and the spacecraft is  lifted and accelerated to orbital velocity. This initial liftoff flight is  concluded at the 2nd stage burnout of the rocket engine. From there  onwards, the spacecraft is in free flight.  The figure below shows the  data provided by the SpaceX Corporation regarding launches from the Reagan Test site2. We have estimated our payload mass at launch to be 600  kg. As can be seen from the figure below, Falcon 1e with such a payload mass can reach  an altitude of approximately 700km when employing a two burn insertion.  
 Three primary variables r (distance from the center of the earth), v (velocity of the vehicle), and Φ (angle between the velocity  and position vector) are needed to specify the vehicle’s orbit. 
 Let r1, v1, and Φ1 be the initial launch  values. Then, the following equation allows us to solve for the perigee and apogee altitudes. 
 G is the universal gravitational constant, and M is the mass of Earth. Equation 2 results in two solutions. The smaller  of the two results will be the perigee value and the other will be the apogee  value of the parking orbit. Our spacecraft’s launch will terminate (ideally) at  perigee with a Φ1 value of  90°. In addition, we will accelerate our vehicle to a velocity of  7.9 km/s at this location. As such: r1  = (6378.14 + 700) x 1000 = 7,078,140 m v1  = 7900 m/s G = 6.673 x  10-11 m3kg-1s-2 M = 5.9742  x 1024 kgPutting  these values in equation 2 yields: 
 
 The perigee result was expected to be 700km based on an ideal Φ1 value  of 90°. However, we expect Φ1 to have a value close, but not equal, to the ideal. We plan to use the Reaction  Control System (RCS) mentioned in the propulsion system design section to  counter errors in our trajectory. We can also  calculate the eccentricity of this elliptical orbit using the following equation4. 
 Return to top Position Location in Parking Orbit It is paramount to track the spacecraft while in parking orbit. This is important because transfer orbit processes must be initiated at the right time and at the  desired apogee location of the orbit. In this section, a few equations will  be developed that will help locate the position of the spacecraft in the  orbit after a specific period, as well as finding the time duration required to travel to a certain position. To do this, the mean anomaly, M, must be  introduced5.Mean anomaly of an orbiting body is  a measure of the angle it will move about the center of its orbit relative to  its perigee location. This simplifies measuring the time of  flight between two locations on the orbit as it changes linearly with time10. 
 where Mo is  the mean anomaly at time to, n is the spacecraft’s average angular  velocity, and a is the orbit’s  semi-major axis. Equation 5 can provide a perfect solution for a circular  orbit. However, since our orbit is elliptical, the radius varies. As such,  eccentric anomaly, E, must be defined. This value is related to the mean  anomaly by equation 7. 
 With the help of equation 5, 6 and 7, the  position  of the spacecraft at any time t in  its orbit can be determined.  Return to top On the way to moon  The next stage of the journey to the Moon requires a transfer from parking orbit to transfer orbit. This is accomplished by firing the  spacecraft’s engine when it reaches its apogee. The goal is to make the apogee  of the parking orbit serve as the perigee of the mission orbit. The apogee of  the transfer orbit corresponds to the Moon. 
  Using  equations 8 and 9, the velocity of the spacecraft can be determined both at the  perigee and apogee of the parking orbit. The velocity at apogee and perigee is  given by: 
 The result also confirms the perigee velocity of 7.9 km/s  used in earlier calculations. The velocity that will be required at the perigee of the  transfer orbit to obtain the required apogee is now calculated. Again employing  equation 9: 
 As such, a velocity increment of (9403.64 –  6355.86) = 3047.78 m/s is required. To achieve this velocity increment, the  spacecraft will burn its engine for a time period t. This burn period can be calculated using equation 10: 
 where mo is  the initial mass of the spacecraft, q is the rate of ejection of mass flow, and ΔV is the change in velocity. Our mission is to  initiate the engine burners at time to such that the spacecraft reaches its transfer orbit perigee point after a  time period t. Using equations 5, 6,  7, and 10, the correct initial time to and the location of the spacecraft in its orbit can easily be calculated.  Return to top Adjusting  Orbital Inclination A  crucial flight maneuver in our mission is to adjust the orbital inclination.  The Moon’s orbital inclination with respect to Earth’s equator varies  between 18.29° to 28.58°. Vehicle launch from the Reagan  Test Site provides an orbital inclination of 9.1°2. As such, in order  to change the spacecraft’s orbital plane inclination, a change in the direction  of its velocity vector is required, shown below. This is achieved by having a  component of Δv perpendicular to the  initial velocity vector vi.  A fuel efficient way is to have the inclination change during the tangential  burn will be employed at the apogee as part of the transfer orbit5, preventing the fuel consumption of a separate plane  change process. Equation 11 is used to calculate the necessary  velocity change requirement. 
 
 where vi is the initial velocity, vf is the final velocity, and θ is the  change in the inclination angle required.  Return to top Orbital  Perturbations Most of the  equations developed in the preceding sections assume an ideal situation where  the spacecraft’s calculated orbital path is not perturbed by any force other  than the rocket’s thrust and Earth’s gravitation. However, this is generally  not the case. Our spacecraft will be tracked during its journey to the Moon as mentioned in the TT&C section. The aforementioned RCS systems will be employed during this flight phase to bring the  spacecraft back on track in case of a change in trajectory. A few causes of  perturbations are mentioned in this section. However, there are many more, such  as perturbations due to Earth’s oblateness, atmospheric drag during launch, etc.  Perturbations  caused by gravitational forces of Sun and Moon One of the main causes  of perturbation to the orbit is the effect of the Sun’s and Moon’s gravitation.  They cause perturbations in longitude of the  ascending node and argument of perigee. 
 Perturbations caused at the argument of perigee5: 
 Perturbations caused at the longitude of ascending node5: 
 where i is the  inclination of the orbit, n is the  number of times the orbit will revolve per day, and Ω and ω are in degrees.     Perturbations  caused by solar radiation Solar radiation cause changes in all of the orbital mechanics parameters of the  spacecraft by imparting acceleration. The magnitude of this  acceleration is provided by: 
 Where ar is the imparted acceleration, A is  the cross-section area exposed to the sun, and m is the mass of the spacecraft.  Return to top Orbit InsertionLunar orbit insertion (LOI) is by  far the most critical step of the spacecraft’s journey to Moon. The process is  to place the spacecraft in the lunar orbit at the correct position and time. In  addition to precise time and position, the spacecraft needs to be decelerated  in a controlled manner. The deceleration is achieved using the retrograde  burners on board the spacecraft. 
 This is a complex maneuver. If the engines burn too  long, the spacecraft’s speed will reduce to the point that it drops onto the lunar surface instead of being captured by the orbit. On the  other hand, if the engines do not burn long enough, the  spacecraft will pass the Moon into an unpredictable and uncontrollable  elliptical orbit13. Our system is designed to use the Moon's gravity to trigger the pre-programmed commands to initiate  the retrograde burners at the correct time and position during its flight. This will reduce  the velocity and place the spacecraft in a 90km x 100km orbit around the moon,  similar to the Luna 21 orbit mission14. The spacecraft will be  captured into the lunar orbit once this retro-burn process is accomplished.  Return to top Launch  Window Launch window is a  period during which a launch must be initiated to meet mission objectives. The  window depends on the location of the earth and moon in their respective orbits.  The launch time must be selected carefully so that the orbits of the Moon and spacecraft overlap at the calculated intersection time.  Furthermore, since Earth rotates 5° every 20 minutes, the time  of the day to launch a spacecraft must be chosen cautiously in relation to the  direction towards the desired perigee12.   The Moon will have a perigee distance of 356,592 km on January 30, 2010, at 9:00 Universal  time (UTC). The corresponding local time at Reagan Test Site will be 9:00 PM. We  plan to intercept the moon at this time to reduce the travel distance of our spacecraft. In case of bad weather or any other  unforeseen technical delays, our next launch window will depend of an expected  intercept date of February 27th, 2010, at 21:41 (UTC).  The Moon’s distance from earth will be 357,831 km on this date8.  Our goal is to insert  the spacecraft into parking orbit around Earth during which time its telemetry components will be analyzed to  determine if the systems are functioning properly. This will establish how well  the spacecraft survived the initial launch operation. Any system not functioning properly will perform  pre-defined tests to restore proper functioning or further analyze the problem.  Communication through USN will also be tested to confirm reliable  data transfer and signal strength6. The  spacecraft will remain in the parking orbit for two complete orbital revolutions  before starting its final journey to the Moon on the transfer orbit. Equation  11 is used to determine the orbital period T of a satellite. 
 where a is the semi-major axis, and µ (µ  = GM) is Kepler’s constant. Employing equation 11, the total time  duration for a satellite to reach Moon can be calculated: 
 As such, it will take 4 days, 15 hrs, and 50.82 minutes  for the spacecraft to reach the moon. This estimation is based on the  assumption that no orbital maneuvers other than a transfer took place.  Furthermore, the time it takes to reach second stage burnout was not included  when performing the calculations.  In view of  the above results, our rocket will liftoff from the Reagan Test Site on the 26th  of January, 2010, at 1:00 PM local time to make the intersection with Moon.  Return to top 
 [1] http://wwwn.cdc.gov/travel/destinationMarshallIslands.aspx [2] http://www.spacex.com/Falcon%201%20Payload%20Users%20Guide.pdf
 [3]  “Satellite Communication”, by Timothy Pratt, 2nd Edition, Published  2003 John Wiley & Sons, pg 17-27
 [4] “Orbital  Mechanics: Theory and Applications”, by Tom Logsdon, Published 1997 Wiley-IEEE,  pg 1.
 [5] http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm
 [6] http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/
 [7] http://www.visualstatistics.net/East-West/Long%20Waves%20of%20Time/
 KeplerB.jpg
 [8] http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/pacalc.html
 [9] http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/spacecraft/q0164.shtml
 [10] http://www.sat-net.com/winorbit/help/kepmeananomaly.html
 [11] http://www.braeunig.us/space/propuls.htm
 [12] http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=9198
 [13] “Space Exploration and Disasters”, by Richard Russell, 2005, Carroll &  Graf, pg 210.
 [14] http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/masterCatalog.do?sc=1973-001A
 [15] http://www.arm.ac.uk/venustransit/exhibit/fig9-s.jpg
 |