Home

  Communications

  Location System

  Power System

  Propulsion System

  Orbital Mechanics

  Budget & Timeline

Location Systems

Simulation of the Dilution of Precision (DOP)

Dilution of Precision describes the geometric strength of a satellite configuration for position accuracy. In this Maritan Global Positioning System, Positional Dilution of Precision (PDOP) is used to assess the geometric quality of the satellite constellation. Simulation results of the chosen orbital constellations indicate that the average PDOP value is 4.473 m (see orbital mechanics). The table below shows the horizontal, vertical, and geometric DOP.

HDOP
VDOP
GDOP
2.207 m
3.875 m
4.91 m

Position Error Calculation

Since the primary constraint on the system is the +/- 5m accuracy, this constraint was set as a worst-case value and the other parameters were back-solved. This ensures that the system will meet the design specifications.

For the Mars network, the number of satellite in view varies between 4 and 6, and the signal strengths also vary depending on the elevation angle of the satellite and the orientation of the receiver [1]. The C/A code will be modulated using BPSK. The following calculations assume that averaging is used under worst-case scenario conditions.

Bn = Bandwidth = 2.5 MHz after filtering
Tbit = 20ms
Tint = 1ms
Tchip = Chip Period = 400ns
σtot = total positional error
σr = position error
C = carrier Power
N = noise Power
Nsat = number of satellites visible
c = speed of light
M = number of chips/bit
Q = number of equal power satellites

The above calculations find that the receiver noise error is 4.73 meters.

Uncorrected Total Error

From this point, the total error calculation is trivial. The errors used in the calculations are shown below.

Satellite Clock Error
σc
3.5 m (same as Earth GPS)
Ephemeris Error
σe
4.3 m (similar to Earth GPS)
Receiver Noise
σn
4.73 m (calculated above)
Tropospheric Delay
σt
0.0135 m (based on Mars' tropospheric density compared to Earth's (1/148th)) [3]
Selective Availability
σsa
0 m (none on Mars)
Ionospheric Delay
σi
Negligible [3]
Multipath Error
σm
Negligible

The total positional error is the sum of the squares of the errors, yielding an uncorrected error that is lower than that of Earth's GPS.

This error can be reduced by using intelligent correction techniques to reduce clock error and ephemeris error [2]. The Martian Global Positioning System uses frequent clock synchronizations and ephemeris correction signals to overcome these errors.

Position Estimate

For the Martian Global Positioning System, the average time to collect sufficient measurement observations to compute a prescribed accurate position is given by:

δt = rms timing error
SNR = signal to noise power ratio for the pulse in the noise bandwidth Bn
Gp = correlator processing gain
(for C/A code: Gp = 1023 = 30.1 dB)
M = code length

The rms timing error is δt = 0.3726μs. As with a typical GPS receiver, the Martian GPS receiver will also update the display no more than twice per second, so the pulses can be averagd over a period of a half second, which will decrease the rms error by the square root of 500 to an rms value of 16.81ns [1]. The worst-case rms distance error is then found to be 5 meters.

Link Budget

The following values are used to calculate the communication link for this MPS.

Bn = Bandwidth = 2.5 MHz after filtering
Fc = Frequency = 2.4GHz
Gt = Tx gain = 0dBi
Gr = Rx gain =5dBi (average gain for +/- 60º)
R = Radius of orbit = 16859.2 km
Pn = Noise power
Pr = Power at the receiver
Tp = Physical Receiver Temperature = 212K [1]


Pn= kBnTp = -141.36dBW

Solving for Pt = 8.863dB = 7.7 Watts

This means that the satellites only need to broadcast 7.7 Watts to maintain sufficient positional accuracy. This power level is reasonable and can easily be incorporated into the power budget.

[1] T. Pratt, C. Bostian, and J. Allnutt, Satellite Communications, 2nd Ed., pp. 475-476, 2003.
[2] D. J. Bell et al, “Mars Network: A Mars Orbiting Communications & Navigation Satellite Constellation”, Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Symposium, Pasadena CA, 1999.
[3] http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-149/149C.pdf

Images: [A] http://cndyorks.gn.apc.org/yspace/articles/gps_upgrade.htm